The information is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice.
1 Practice Areas
1 Notable Representations
1 Insights
Architecture and design professional disputes arise at the intersection of construction law, professional liability, and commercial contract litigation. These matters involve claims arising from the scope of professional services, design obligations, contractual payment terms, and liability for alleged errors or omissions in the context of large-scale building and development projects. The practice encompasses both the defense and prosecution of claims by and against architecture firms, design professionals, and their institutional counterparts.
Architecture firms and design professionals operate in contractual environments of substantial complexity — engaging with developers, owners, general contractors, and construction managers under relationships governed by detailed professional service agreements, AIA-standard forms, and project-specific instruments. Disputes in this space frequently turn on the definition of contractual scope, the professional standard of care, and the allocation of risk among parties to large construction programs.
Architecture and design professional disputes engage parties across the full construction program — developers and owners on one side, design professionals and their firms on the other — with claims that commonly involve the definition of contracted services, the adequacy of design work, the professional standard of care, and the allocation of responsibility when construction projects encounter problems. These matters are frequently fact-intensive, require engagement with technical expert testimony, and arise in the context of projects that may still be in progress.
These disputes engage the full range of professional service instruments — AIA-standard agreements, project-specific contracts, change order documentation, and project correspondence — and frequently involve simultaneous proceedings across multiple forums, including arbitration panels and state and federal courts. The parties may include institutional developers, general contractors, and public or private project owners, each with distinct contractual interests and exposure within the applicable project structure.
Effective representation in architecture and design professional disputes requires fluency in both professional liability doctrine and the contractual frameworks that govern design services. These matters often arise in high-stakes environments — large development projects where the financial exposure is substantial, the technical facts are complex, and the outcome may affect the professional reputation of the design firm or individual. Counsel must be capable of translating technical design and construction standards into persuasive legal argument.
Management of design professional disputes requires early attention to project documentation — contracts, drawings, correspondence, and change order records — as well as careful coordination with technical experts on the applicable standard of care. These matters frequently involve parallel disputes among multiple project participants, requiring strategy that accounts for overlapping claims, competing interests in the construction program, and the potential for settlement or arbitration alongside or in lieu of litigation.
Insights addressing legal developments and issues related to this area of focus.
Preeminent global architecture firm
Represented preeminent global architecture firm in high stakes litigation case with large U.S. based developer.