The information is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice.
2 Practice Areas
2 Notable Representations
4 Insights
Construction defect and infrastructure failure litigation encompasses the defense and prosecution of claims arising from structural failures, design inadequacies, material deficiencies, and catastrophic incidents in the built environment. These matters involve manufacturers, contractors, design professionals, developers, and public entities in disputes over responsibility for defective construction, substandard materials, and failures that result in property damage, personal injury, or loss of life. The practice addresses both the technical complexity of establishing causation and the legal complexity of allocating liability among multiple parties in the construction chain.
Construction defect and infrastructure failure cases occupy a critical position within construction and real estate litigation because of the magnitude of the potential exposure — both financial and reputational — and the intersection of engineering, regulatory, and legal disciplines required to litigate these matters effectively. Catastrophic infrastructure events frequently generate parallel regulatory investigations by federal and state agencies, adding procedural layers that must be managed alongside the civil litigation.
Construction defect and infrastructure failure matters arise when failures in design, construction, materials, or maintenance result in property damage, structural compromise, or catastrophic events. These disputes engage multiple parties across the construction chain — owners, developers, general contractors, subcontractors, material suppliers, design professionals, and testing laboratories — each with distinct contractual relationships, insurance arrangements, and liability exposures. Establishing causation requires coordination with engineering experts, materials scientists, and forensic investigators.
The complexity of these matters is compounded by the multi-party nature of construction programs and the overlapping regulatory frameworks — including building codes, OSHA requirements, and federal investigatory oversight by agencies such as the NTSB — that govern construction safety and infrastructure integrity. Infrastructure failure cases in particular involve high public visibility and may generate wrongful death claims, personal injury actions, and property damage suits alongside regulatory proceedings, all of which must be managed within a coordinated defense strategy.
Effective representation in construction defect and infrastructure failure cases requires the ability to manage technical complexity — including forensic engineering analysis, materials testing, and expert testimony — within a litigation framework that accounts for multi-party dynamics, insurance coverage considerations, and the potential for parallel regulatory proceedings. The strategic approach must integrate the technical investigation with the legal theory of the case and the practical realities of multi-defendant litigation.
Insights addressing legal developments and issues related to this area of focus.
Wrongful death matters arise when a fatality results from negligence, misconduct, or unlawful actions. These cases focus on establishing liability and pursuing accountability and compensation for surviving family members.
Condo Board
Successful multi-million dollar verdict for condo owners for construction defects and not adhering to project timeline.
Media Coverage: The Real Deal
Concrete manufacturer
Successfully defended concrete manufacturer in high-profile infrastructure failure case.
Media Coverage: Good Morning America · PBS · CNN