The information is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice.
1 Practice Areas
3 Notable Representations
1 Insights
Franchise and licensing disputes involve conflicts between franchisors and franchisees, licensors and licensees, and parties to commercial agreements governing the use of brands, intellectual property, and business systems. These matters arise from the contractual relationships that define franchise operations — including territorial rights, performance standards, royalty obligations, and the conditions under which franchise agreements may be terminated or renewed. The legal frameworks governing franchise relationships are shaped by both federal and state regulations, including franchise disclosure laws and relationship statutes that impose specific obligations on franchisors.
Franchise and licensing disputes frequently involve significant financial stakes — including claims for lost profits, termination damages, and the value of the franchisee’s investment in the business — and can affect the operational viability of both individual franchise locations and broader franchise networks. Resolution requires counsel who can navigate the intersection of contract law, intellectual property, regulatory compliance, and the commercial realities of franchise operations across multiple jurisdictions and industries.
Franchise disputes arise from the complex contractual relationships between franchisors and franchisees — relationships governed by franchise agreements, operating manuals, territorial exclusivity provisions, and applicable franchise disclosure and relationship laws. These matters may involve claims of wrongful termination, failure to satisfy performance standards, disputed royalty and fee calculations, encroachment on territorial rights, and alleged misrepresentations in franchise offering documents. Licensing disputes present analogous issues in the context of intellectual property licensing, brand licensing arrangements, and technology license agreements, where the rights and obligations of the parties are defined by contract and shaped by applicable intellectual property law.
The complexity of franchise and licensing disputes is amplified by the multi-jurisdictional nature of many franchise networks, the regulatory requirements applicable to franchise sales and operations, and the economic interdependence between franchisors and franchisees. These matters frequently involve injunctive relief — including claims for temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions to prevent termination of franchise operations or enforcement of non-compete provisions — and require counsel who can manage the intersection of contractual analysis, regulatory compliance, and business operations litigation.
Effective representation in franchise and licensing disputes requires counsel who can navigate the regulatory environment governing franchise relationships, analyze complex contractual provisions, and develop litigation strategies that protect the client’s commercial interests and operational continuity. These matters demand the capacity to move quickly when injunctive relief is required — whether to prevent a wrongful termination from taking effect, to enforce territorial exclusivity, or to protect intellectual property rights during a dispute. Counsel must also be prepared to manage multi-jurisdictional proceedings, given the geographic scope of many franchise networks.
Experience in franchise and licensing disputes spans representation of both franchisors and franchisees across hospitality, retail, food service, and fitness industries. The approach integrates aggressive advocacy in litigation and arbitration with the practical commercial judgment necessary to evaluate settlement and restructuring alternatives that preserve the franchise relationship or facilitate an orderly separation. In disputes involving national and international franchise brands, the strategy accounts for the reputational implications of the dispute and the broader impact on the franchise system.
Insights addressing legal developments and issues related to this area of focus.
Representation in high-stakes contract and partnership disputes involving complex agreements and sophisticated parties.
Imperial Brands, Empire Merchants, Genesis Global Sourcing, & CC1 Companies
Successfully defended numerous bottlers and distributors of alcohol, wine and spirits.
Media Coverage: Law360
McDonald’s, Ace Hardware, & Orange Theory
Represented major franchise brands in complex business and operational matters.
Nation’s Largest Truck Stop Operator
Successfully defended Pilot Travel Centers (DBA Pilot Flying J), a Berkshire Hathaway company and the nation’s largest truck stop operator with $42B in annual revenues, in a dispute involving various contractual elements centering on Pilot Branded Dealers (independent) and its corporate parent.